Why to Start New IT Career Under a Mentorship
What is mentoring?
Mentoring is most often defined as a professional relationship in
which an experienced person (the mentor) assists another (the mentored) in
developing specific skills and knowledge that will enhance the less-experienced
person’s professional and personal growth.
What does a mentor do?
The following are among the mentor’s functions:
·
Teaches the mentoree about a specific issue
·
Coaches the mentoree on a particular skill
·
Facilitates the mentoree’s growth by sharing
resources and networks
·
Challenges the mentoree to move beyond his or
her comfort zone
·
Creates a safe learning environment for taking
risks
·
Focuses on the mentoree’s total development
Are mentoring and coaching identical?
No. People often confuse mentoring and coaching. Though related,
they are not the same. A mentor may
coach, but a coach is not a mentor. Mentoring is “relational,” while
coaching is “functional.” There are other significant differences.
Coaching characteristics:
·
Managers coach all of their staff as a
required part of the job
·
Coaching takes place within the confines of a
formal manager-employee relationship
·
Focuses on developing individuals within their
current jobs
·
Interest is functional, arising out of the
need to ensure that individuals can perform the tasks required to the best of
their abilities
·
Relationship tends to be initiated and driven
by an individual’s manager
·
Relationship is finite - ends as an individual
transfers to another job
Mentoring characteristics:
·
Takes place outside of a line manager-employee
relationship, at the mutual consent of a mentor and the person being mentored
·
Is career-focused or focuses on professional
development that may be outside a mentoree’s area of work
·
Relationship is personal - a mentor provides
both professional and personal support
·
Relationship may be initiated by a mentor or
created through a match initiated by the organization
·
Relationship crosses job boundaries
·
Relationship may last for a specific period of
time (nine months to a year) in a formal program, at which point the pair may
continue in an informal mentoring relationship
Are buddy systems and mentoring programs the
same?
No. Buddy systems are initiated by organizations to help new
employees adjust to jobs during their first few months of employment.
Buddies are most often peers in the
same department, who assist new employees for short periods of time and require
no specialized training as a buddy.
Mentoring is a more complex
relationship and focuses on both short- and long-term professional development
goals. Though a mentor may be an employee’s peer, most often a mentor is a
person at least one level higher in the organization who is not within the
mentoree’s direct supervisory line of management.
Why do organizations implement formal
mentoring programs?
Interest in mentoring has varied over time and has been affected
by economic and social factors. Organizations recognize that workforce
demographics have changed dramatically in recent years, as women and members of
different minority groups have joined the workforce in greater numbers. In
addition, technology has automated traditional employee functions and continues
to affect on-the-job performance, altering the way people see themselves within
the corporate structure.
With these changes, organizations are
finding it difficult to recruit and retain qualified personnel. As corporate
downsizing continues, organizations are also experiencing a flattening of their
organizations, challenging them to provide sufficient growth opportunities for
employees.
On the plus side, organizations find
today’s employees exhibit a more flexible approach to work. On the minus side,
employees may feel less loyalty to the organizations for which they work. Organizations
now look to mentoring to implement a strategic game plan that includes:
·
Recruitment
·
Retention
·
Professional development
·
Development of a multicultural workforce
Does mentoring happen naturally?
Absolutely. Informal mentoring occurs all the time and is a
powerful experience. The problem is that informal mentoring is often accessible
only to a few employees and its benefits are limited only to those few who
participate. Formal or structured mentoring takes mentoring to the next level
and expands its usefulness and corporate value beyond that of a single
mentor-mentoree pairing.
How is informal and formal mentoring
different?
Informal and formal mentoring are often confused, but they are
very different in their approaches and outcomes.
Informal mentoring:
·
Goals of the relationship are not specified
·
Outcomes are not measured
·
Access is limited and may be exclusive
·
Mentors and mentorees self-select on the basis
of personal chemistry
·
Mentoring lasts a long time; sometimes a
lifetime
·
The organization benefits indirectly, as the
focus is exclusively on the mentoree
Formal mentoring:
· Goals are established from the beginning by
the organization and the employee mentoree
Outcomes are measured·
Access is open to all who meet program
criteria Mentors and mentorees are paired based on
compatibility
·
Training and support in mentoring is provided
·
Organization and employee both benefit
directly.
What do you mean by “chemistry” and
“compatibility?”
"Chemistry" is an
intense, very personal feeling – an initial connection or attraction between
two individuals that may develop into a strong, emotional bond. Unstructured
and unpredictable, it is the basis for an informal mentoring relationship.
"Compatibility" occurs
when individuals work together in harmony to achieve a common purpose. In
formal mentoring, that means a more-seasoned person leading someone less
experienced through a structured professional-development program in much the
same way teachers facilitate learning.
Why do organizations need a structured
mentoring program? Aren’t managers already performing this role?
While many managers demonstrate mentoring behavior on an informal
basis, it is very different from having a structured mentoring program. There
is a qualitative difference between a manager-employee relationship and a
mentor-mentoree relationship.
Managerial Role
The manager-employee relationship focuses on achieving the
objectives of the department and the company. The manager assigns tasks,
evaluates the outcome, conducts performance reviews, and recommends possible
salary increases and promotions.
Because managers hold significant
power over employees’ work lives, most employees demonstrate only their
strengths and hide their weaknesses in the work environment.
Mentoring Role
A mentor-mentoree relationship focuses on developing the mentoree
professionally and personally. As such, the mentor does not evaluate the
mentoree with respect to his or her current job, does not conduct performance
reviews of the mentoree, and does not provide input about salary increases and
promotions.
This creates a safe learning
environment, where the mentoree feels free to discuss issues openly and
honestly, without worrying about negative consequences on the job.
The roles of manager and mentor are
fundamentally different. That’s why structured mentoring programs never pair
mentors with their direct reports.
What are the benefits of mentoring?
Mentoring benefits the organization, mentors and mentorees. A
successful mentoring program benefits your organization by:
·
Enhancing strategic business initiatives
·
Encouraging retention
·
Reducing turnover costs
·
Improving productivity
·
Breaking down the "silo" mentality
that hinders cooperation among company departments or divisions.
·
Elevating knowledge transfer from just getting
information and to retaining the practical experience and wisdom gained from
long-term employees.
·
Enhancing professional development.
·
Linking employees with valuable knowledge and
information to other employees in need of such information
·
Using your own employees, instead of outside
consultants, as internal experts for professional development
·
Supporting the creation of a multicultural
workforce by creating relationships among diverse employees and allowing equal
access to mentoring.
·
Creating a mentoring culture, which
continuously promotes individual employee growth and development?
Mentors enjoy many benefits, including:
·
Gains insights from the mentoree’s background
and history that can be used in the mentor’s professional and personal
development.
·
Gains satisfaction in sharing expertise with
others.
·
Re-energizes the mentor’s career.
·
Gains an ally in promoting the organization’s
well-being.
·
Learns more about other areas within the
organization.
Mentorees enjoy many benefits, including:
·
Gains from the mentor’s expertise
·
Receives critical feedback in key areas, such
as communications, interpersonal relationships, technical abilities, change
management and leadership skills
·
Develops a sharper focus on what is needed to
grow professionally within the organization
·
Learns specific skills and knowledge that are
relevant to personal goals
·
Networks with a more influential employee
·
Gains knowledge about the organization’s
culture and unspoken rules that can be critical for success; as a result,
adapts more quickly to the organization’s culture
·
Has a friendly ear with which to share frustrations
as well as successes.
How does an organization know when it’s ready
to implement a formal mentoring program?
An organization that values its employees and is committed to
providing opportunities for them to remain and grow within the organization is
an ideal candidate for initiating a mentoring program. Ideally, the
organization has an internal structure to support a successful program. Examples include:
·
A performance management program
·
Developed competencies
·
A valued-training function
·
Diversity training
·
A succession-planning process
·
A management development program
·
Strategic business objectives
In addition, there should be
individuals within the higher ranks of the organization who will champion the
mentoring initiative and help make it happen. Advocates may include the
organization’s president, vice presidents and other influential executives.
A Mentoring Program Manager (MPM) is
also needed to coordinate the mentoring program. The MPM should be someone who
is perceived as a facilitator, listener and coalition-builder – a person who is
trusted. MPM is not a full-time position, so mentoring responsibilities must be
balanced with the MPM’s other duties. Typically, such a person works in a Human
Resources, Organizational Development, Training or Diversity Department.
What does a Mentoring Program Manager do?
Coordinating the mentoring process within the organization means
working with a Management Mentors consultant, as well as fellow employees, to
design and implement a mentoring initiative that fits the organization’s
culture.
The initiative forms the basis for
ongoing mentoring. During the pilot, a Mentoring Program Manager (MPM)
typically works with 20 to 30 individuals (10 to 15 pairs). The manager
contacts them on a regular basis, making certain the relationships are going
well and that the mentoring program is achieving its goals. The MPM offers each
pair whatever resources may be needed.
The MPM also becomes the
organization’s internal mentoring expert, serving as a resource for various
departments and divisions that have an interest in pursuing mentoring.
The amount of time this take varies.
Normally, a MPM spends one to four hours per week coordinating the project,
depending on how often the mentor-mentoree pairs meet.
How can we create a pilot mentoring program?
The Mentoring Program Manager forms a task force of 6-8 people.
Members of the task force should represent a cross-section of the organization,
including potential mentors and mentorees, supervisory personnel and any
stakeholders who can bring value to the process. For example, a representative
from Human Resources might help tie department goals with the goals of the
mentoring program.
The task force:
·
Determines the goals of the program
·
Chooses the proper mentoring model
·
Selects criteria for mentors and mentorees
·
Defines other critical components of the
program
·
Interviews potential candidates
·
Matches participants
·
Evaluates results at the end of the pilot
program
How can you determine an organization’s need
for mentoring?
Some organizations conduct focus groups, employee surveys or both
to determine where the need for mentoring is greatest, and whether there is
sufficient support for a mentoring program.
Other organizations rely on task force
members, who have been asked to participate because of their knowledge of the
organization and the population being targeted. The appropriate method depends
on what steps an organization has already taken as well as what resources are
available. In general, focus groups are relatively low-cost, while surveys can
be costly. If you would like Management Mentors to create a focus group or
conduct a survey for you, click here.
Are there different types of mentoring models
in a structured program? What are they?
One of the advantages of mentoring is that it can be adapted to
any organization’s culture and resources. There are several mentoring models to
choose from when developing a mentoring program, including:
1. One-On-One
Mentoring
The most common mentoring model, one-on-one mentoring match’s one mentor
with one mentoree. Most people prefer this model because it allows both mentor
and mentoree to develop a personal relationship and provides individual support
for the mentoree. Availability of mentors is the only limitation.
2. Resource-Based
Mentoring
Resource-based mentoring offers some of the same features as
one-on-one mentoring. The main difference is that mentors and mentorees are not
interviewed and matched by a Mentoring Program Manager. Instead, mentors agree
to add their names to a list of available mentors from which a mentoree can
choose. It is up to the mentoree to initiate the process by asking one of the
volunteer mentors for assistance. This model typically has limited support
within the organization and may result in mismatched mentor-mentoree pairing.
3. Group
Mentoring
Group mentoring requires a mentor to work with 4-6 mentorees at
one time. The group meets once or twice a month to discuss various topics.
Combining senior and peer mentoring, the mentor and the peer’s help one another
learn and develop appropriate skills and knowledge.
Group mentoring is limited by the difficulty of regularly
scheduling meetings for the entire group. It also lacks the personal
relationship that most people prefer in mentoring. For this reason, it is often
combined with the one-on-one model. For example, some organizations provide
each mentoree with a specific mentor. In addition, the organization offers
periodic meetings in which a senior executive meets with all of the mentors and
mentorees, who then share their knowledge and expertise.
4. Training-Based
Mentoring
This model is tied directly to a training program. A mentor is
assigned to a mentoree to help that person develop the specific skills being
taught in the program. Training-based mentoring is limited, because it focuses
on the subject at hand and doesn’t help the mentoree develop a broader skill
set.
5. Executive
Mentoring
This top-down model may be the most effective way to create a
mentoring culture and cultivate skills and knowledge throughout an organization.
It is also an effective succession-planning tool, because it prevents the
knowledge "brain drain" that would otherwise take place when senior
management retires. For further information, click here.
What is the role of diversity in mentoring?
Mentoring can be of great value to women and people of color.
These are the employees who have often been disenfranchised within
organizations and have not been “chosen” by informal mentors.
However, if mentoring is to be
successful as a tool for empowering employees, it needs to be truly diverse –
representing everyone within the organization and not just women and people of
color. By including the broadest spectrum of people, mentoring offers everyone
the opportunity to grow professionally and personally without regard to gender
or race. A successful mentoring program needs to balance the need for inclusion
with the need for fair representation.
For many years, some organizations
thought of mentoring only as a tool to help women and people of color. Viewed
inappropriately as a remedial program, mentoring lacked widespread support
within most organizations.
These mentoring programs did not
provide mentorees with the assistance they really needed. Good intentions gone
astray resulted in a misapplication of mentoring.
Diversity is equally important when
choosing mentors within organizations. Because many mentoring programs are
geared to management levels, today’s mentor population still tends to be made
up of white males.
As organizations seek to devise mentoring
programs, they need to include mentors who are both non-white and non-male.
Using the resource-based or group-based models, tied to the one-on-one
mentoring model, can help diversify the mentor population.
For
example, one of the mentoring goals might be to learn how to navigate
effectively through the organization’s culture. Using the group model, an
organization might have a panel of diverse employees meeting with the entire
mentor-mentoree population to share how they have successfully navigated that
culture.
Further
reading on diversity:
·
The Diversity Manager's Role in Your Mentoring
Program
·
How to Start a Diversity Conversation in Your
Mentoring Program
·
Diversity Initiatives & Mentoring Programs
What results can be achieved in a structured
mentoring program?
Though a great deal has been written about mentoring, there is
little statistical data supporting its value. Much of the published information
available is based on theory alone. Because mentoring is about human
relationships, it is more difficult to quantify scientifically.
Using interviews and questionnaires,
Management Mentors has evaluated mentoring programs implemented by client
companies. The results consistently demonstrate that well-designed programs
lead to the acquisition of knowledge and expertise within a trusting and
supportive mentoring relationship. For a sample view of what results we
achieve, visit, "Results of a Pilot
Mentoring Program."
Why shouldn’t we create a program ourselves?
Creating a structured mentoring program requires a solid
understanding of mentoring dynamics. There are myriad examples of mentoring
programs that failed because organizations mistakenly believed they fully
understood mentoring. Rather than create a successful program, they negatively
impacted the careers of both mentors and mentorees. Typically, such programs
have put people together without clear guidelines, offered no training about
mentoring relationships, lacked internal support, paired employees with the
bosses of the employees’ immediate supervisors, and violated other fundamentals
of mentoring.
The amount of outside expertise needed
to establish a mentoring program varies from organization to organization. Most
organizations have found that using a consultant to set up a pilot program has
made the difference between success and failure.
What does an outside consulting firm offer a
prospective client?
Experienced
consultants provide:
Cost
effectiveness - reduces the time and effort needed to establish a program
Successful
design - program operates more efficiently based on successful designs
employed by similar organizations
Improved
results - focuses on specific competency areas
Higher
success rate - previous mentoring expertise helps organizations avoid pitfalls
that have derailed many mentoring programs.